Offering Refuge to the World’s Weary

A “refugee” is “someone seeking refuge” which quickly expands to us all in meditation or prayer.

Whole communities came to the New World on those dangerous watercraft, seeking liberty, freedom from persecution, the right to be left alone.  Relationships were continued, at a village level.

Thinking of refugee camps as full of solitary individuals, each needing a desk job and a bus pass, a separate singleton existence, is of course unrealistic.

Extended families often do not wish to be broken up.  They live as a tribe, whole communities.

At a party for Leos last night, celebrating those born with this astrological sign, I spied a catalog for the latest camping gear.  A love of the outdoors is rekindled, in looking through these pages.

Do we all know where the word “camping” comes from?  From “campaigning”.

The goal was to distill the “fun part” of campaigning and leave out all the pathological murderous killing.  That’s how “camping” came about.

Rather than trying to solve the world’s problems with explosive devices and unsustainable pain levels, investing in the latest camping gear and gardening equipment might make more sense.

Suppliers would have many product placement opportunities.  Every Dignity Village could be a showcase.

My friend Patrick got to visit Biosphere 2 near Tuscon recently and confirmed a large dome may be self cooling, given air flows.

I’m not saying everyone wants to tent and/or garden in a dome as a lifestyle, but others would, and would make it as telegenic as that catalog.

Many experiments need to be tried.  We have a lot of engineering creativity and capacity, why not use it?

Having many smallish colonies guinea pigging the new products, willingly, giving feedback, like test pilots, would be part of what “scouting” means.

That’s part of how one trades lifestyle ideas with the rest of the world: test out something new and let us judge for ourselves what we might like to adopt from it.

Quaker communities:  given some hundreds of years of prior practice, and a willingness to relinquish violence, these could be some of the best.

The biggest most expensive camps in present times tend to be military and “killingry oriented”. We also have many para-military encampments in North America, though we’re uncomfortable focusing on that topic in the media.

Here in Oregon many people remember the Rajneesh Puram experiment and how that went.  Not all experiments are equally successful.  The more we engage in, and compare notes, the faster we learn.

Although armed encampments are “campaign” flavored, more than “camping” flavored, the term “refugee” may yet apply.

For example a soldier may have chosen soldiering to escape abject poverty in a cruel economy with no prospects, akin to a war zone.  Lets keep soldiers in our prayers as refugees as well.

The skills learned in the military overlap with “scouting” and “disaster relief”.

Making the transition, from “campaigning” to “camping”, is far from impossible, in a climate that’s less war-crazy.

The idea of community service oriented camps come more from religious templates, centered around a church, temple or mosque.

Rather than stress about the prospect of non-violent religious communities popping up, as schools with campuses, we could welcome our improving living standards (globally, not just locally).

If you’re a refugee on the streets, a family under a freeway viaduct, you’ll be wondering if there might be a community for you out there.

I’m not giving up on mega-project cities, like Old Man River was to be, however I’m thinking our universities may have stopped teaching about those possibilities?  The military bases amount to mega-project cities in some cases.

Civilians may no longer have enough know-how.  When we skip a generation or two, we lose a lot.  I’m not sure who’s left on the scene who could build a geodesic dome or sphere if we wanted one.  In that chapter, we seemed more hopeful.

Maybe NASA has some ideas?  Terraforming proceeds, with or without any master plans.

originally published to the QuakerQuaker website.


By admin on September 9, 2016 | Uncategorized

New Circuit Designs…

[ copied over from QuakerQuaker, September 2016 ]

When I stumbled onto the scene, General Systems Theory appeared to be languishing or at least not going anywhere, having gotten off to a promising start.

My branding instincts, honed in Rome, suggested competing with some other discipline, creating a horse race, might add more life to this picture.

I set about branding GST as an alternative to Economics.  Economics itself preaches the dangers of complacent monopolies, so of all disciplines it deserves some competition, makes perfect sense.  We’ll talk about “guns vs butter” same as they do, but without all the same cultural baggage.

Instead of “economies” we just have “ecosystems” in GST, i.e. human designs and trading practices mesh seamlessly with their non-human surroundings, or “biosphere” as some call it. [1]  I grabbed the ball and ran with it, maybe advancing a few yards. [2]  I felt part of a team.

By sometime in the 1990s, I had the gist of GST boiled it down to three pages:

http://grunch.net/synergetics/gst1.html -> gst2.html -> gst3.html

In building bridges back to Economics, I’ve found the most traction with the Henry George School, one of the many econ branches.

Unless the presentation has a thermodynamic flavor and acknowledges the sun as the fusion powerhouse it is (as in the above Motherboard Earth manifesto), an econ blend is likely closer to that University of Chicago stuff you mention, embraced by neocons more than most. I’d consider such thinking insufficiently cosmic, too ignorant of real science. [3]


[1] “Biosphere” is a far more intelligent concept than mere “climate” (confused with weather, temperature especially). http://mybizmo.blogspot.com/2014/10/biosphere-is-better.html

[2] Another discipline I’ve worked to rescue from the junk heap of history was “lambda calculus”, which is still taught, but could fizzle if not given more to chew on, or with.  I set it up opposite “delta calculus”, the obstacle course already laid out.  Once up to Algebra, you may opt to pursue the Lambda track and get more programming mixed with your XYZ vectors and group theory.

[3] see The Power of Nightmares for more insights into the Chicago University origins of these overlapping Bush Era ideologies

By admin on | Uncategorized