|
Text identical to archival version, embedded hyperlinks
activated.
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 1997 15:07:02 -0800
To: Melissa_Chabran@ed.gov
From: Kirby Urner <pdx4d@teleport.com>
Subject: Memorandum regarding pro-mathematics action
Cc: synergetics-l@teleport.com
November 17, 1997
Melissa Chabran
Planning and Evaluation Service
U.S. Department of Education
Dear Ms. Chabran --
Thank you for your timely reply to my memorandum of October 23, 1997 to
Education Secretary William Riley. As this exchange of views concerns
the public at large, I am archiving our correspondence to my website,
where my pro-math campaign for 1998 has been redubbed "The Great Math
Makeover of 1998" (the idea of "before" and "after" pictures suggests
itself here).
Since my memo to Secretary Riley, I have fine tuned my model of our
campaign to accommodate potential improvements in the curriculum which
would obviate any need for civil disobedience or openly confrontational
(yet nonviolent) actions. I think the many local leaders of the
makeover campaign (which potentially includes many teachers, including
of non-math subjects) will need to exercise their best judgement as
to what is required, on a case by case basis.
I realize that it may not be entirely clear to you, nor to Secretary
Riley, why on earth I would consider weaknesses in the mathematics
curriculum of sufficient urgency to warrant seeking endorsement from
the USA Department of Education for a campaign of any kind, let alone
one involving organized teacher-student protest, given the President's
own policies and current initiatives in this area.
I try to be explicit and focussed around the various related issues
and goals at my website, beginning with a campaign home page at:
"The Great Math Makeover of 1998"
http://www.teleport.com/makeover0.html
To be brief, for the purposes of this communication, let me say simply
that I find insufficient evidence in current working papers or
curriculum planning memoranda accessible to me, through the internet
and other channels, to persuade me that the best interests of the USA
public are being served when it comes to this very important matter of
adequately preparing our young to assume greater responsibility for
creating our shared future. In particular, a lot of positive advances
in the freedoms and social justice department are on hold because our
many educational institutions, recipients of enormous numbers of tax
dollars, continue to ignore curriculum material of relevance to K-12
which would almost certainly give our students a more hopeful and
attractive vision of the 21st Century (and beyond). This means a
lot of bright youngsters are simply not getting the professionally
assisted boost they have a right to expect in our democracy.
I believe these deficiencies are less a matter of fiscal mismanagement
than of misplaced confidance in a system of specialization which has
disconnected even the most earnest reform-minded individuals from their
innate ability to integrate and derive responsible policies based on
analysis of critical information readily available to them in the public
domain. Indeed, it is this very inability to steer the curriculum
juggernaut away from the grave consequences attendant upon over-
specialization which provides the most persuasive proof of the true
urgency of our situation.
I fear the only solution may be to plan for a period of shipwreck and
subsequent floundering about. My makeover campaign may therefore take
on more the aspect of a rescue operation, as the inability of our
institutions to adequately respond becomes ever more evident to those
whom they inadequately serve (myself included).
Thank you again for your timely response. I have every hope that,
working together, we will be able to make 1998 an essentially positive
experience for all concerned.
Sincerely,
Kirby Urner
Curriculum writer
4D Solutions
|
|
Historical note: I sent a followup within minutes correcting the bogus URL for the makeover home page. Synergetics on the
Web |