New Circuit Designs
for Motherboard Earth
By Kirby Urner
4 June 1995
I propose we look at Starship Earth (Buckminster Fuller's
metaphor for our planet) using another metaphor as well: that of
Motherboard Earth.
I tip my hat to the criticism that this is another off-base
nerdy engineering lens through which to misperceive a living planet
and that, although the "mother" part is apt, linking to circuit
boards is just more Newtonian mechanism, more of which we simply
don't need.
But I don't see it that way myself. I think of the powerful film
images I've seen linking urban-scapes from high altitudes with
microchips. Good native American-sounding titles like Powaqqatsi
and Koyanisqaatsi come
to mind (both interesting films). And the energy bathing our
motherboard is more than metaphorically electrical.
In sum, I don't see "motherboard" as necessarily whiteman talk
at all, but a clear-eyed snapshot of what, in fact, our eco-economy
is: a set of spherical circuits, layer upon layer, some phased in
with humans just a split second ago, on the geologic timescale.
BANKING: THE FEAR OF 'LEAKAGE'
Moving on, I look at the psychology of banking, which seems to
view this pool of liquid capital, called gold or currency or
whatever it is that's convertible to just about anything of value,
as the one thing we cannot afford to "leak" away. The whole
investment banking circuitry is about wiring up projects and
programs and powering them with "juice" (liquid capital) only if it
appears the return will exceed the investment. The only electronics
on the motherboard that interests bankers is the kind that "nets a
return" meaning it has to return all the juice received, and then
some.
If I think of my computer as the motherboard, and the wire
plugged into the wall as my umbilical link to the sun, then I start
to wonder about the intelligence of microcode which plans to starve
motherboard assets which are not designed to amplify and return
juice. I mean, the way a computer is designed is like a water
wheel: current flows downhill to the ground, in the meantime
turning wheels which turn other wheels and so on. Yes, the liquid
electricity all drains out the bottom, but serious work got done in
the meantime. Capacitors and storage batteries pool current for a
time, before allowing it to surge onward (the banking idea of
savings). But nowhere is the motherboard (the computer I'm using)
designed to return juice to the wall let alone "with interest."
I look at TV images of human skeletons, either getting a little
charity, or dying in droves, or both, with economists off to the
side shaking their heads: no way to organize these humans into
projects which will net a return to the bankers, and we can't allow
our precious "juice" to just "leak away." So we let our human
families starve to death.
That's just the way it is ... but is nature our model here, or
banking? The sun is broadcasting terawatts of energy in our
direction, second by second. What we do is insert our programmable
circuitry, our gizmos, our wheels turning wheels, and reap the
benefits. Within this game, we have liquid asset accounts, and
transactions, and trade. But the overall big picture is of a
motherboard plugged into the sun and human circuitry that is
designed to starve large portions of the motherboard based on some
dogma about needing to retain precious liquid, currency, without
regard for the true state of affairs, which is that the great
global ecosystem is not about returning juice to the sun, anymore
than my computer is about returning juice to the wall socket. Doing
useful work, yes. Keeping energy from flowing downhill, no way.
NEW CIRCUIT DESIGNS
So that's why I propose General Systems
Theory, which has a clear view of the sun-powered motherboard,
the humanly programmable circuitry which interlayers with nonhuman
circuitry, and the pain and suffering of numerous humans who are
left out because they don't have magic 'juice returning powers' --
why I propose that GST build itself as antithetical to the
juice-worshipping tribes who use their primitive 'economics' to
justify the status quo media programming.
GST takes inventory of human inventions, artifacts, and
storyboards multi-media deployment scenarios, casting humans in
new, interesting, intelligent roles, and sees that we have the
props, and the actors necessary, to make the real-world scenario
entitled: Humans Make a Success of Themselves (lots of
subplots). But instead, the old curriculum directors continue to
produce episode after episode of The Great Tragedy, claiming
that they are the sophisticated ones, whereas we, the
success-oriented directors, are naive, because we don't properly
understand their Theory of Juice.
GST has a different view of juice, it's true. I say we can
afford to drive programming, using solar inputs, that will not only
prevent starvation, but enroll the starving in new distance
education programs that nets them lots of other relevant assets
besides food: medical care, shelter, information, entertainment,
vehicles for self-expression, opportunities to see more of the
planet before they die. I say we don't have to expect our global
university students to pay back their scholarships in any silly
literal kind of way, but that the work of learning a living, of
demonstrating competence, of being a star in world game scenarios
worthy of high caliber acting, is repayment enough.
Do the work of Making Humans a Success, and forget about
'netting a return' in the traditional bankers' sense. Create wealth
(life support), not just more money, and find out how much better
off we will all find ourselves in short order. Lets co-invent
General Systems Theory to light the way forward. And lets leave
Economics behind, in the current Dark
Age, where it belongs.
Reprints
Links
|